On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:08:04 -0500, Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the cite, Gary.
> So if you argue that the experts disagree on the exact figure, then that > is a reasonable argument. But to say that the range is 0 to $3 or $4 > trillion instead of $3 to $7 or $3 to $10 trillion, then you are being > even more misleading than the AAASIC is accusing the SS Trustees of > being. You seem to keep confusing the infinite deficit of SS with the 75 year deficit. The sources you cite use a $7 to $10 trillion PV of an infinite series. The sources I cite have a 75 year deficit of $0 to just over $3 trillion. We may be not as far apart as you think. Gary Denton _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
