>I agree but to be fair, I think one of the big reasons that Clinton >had that fiscal responsibility was because he had a Republican >controlled Congress. <overgeneralization> They wouldn't pass what >he wanted and he'd veto anything they wanted. </overgeneralization>
Also, the "peace dividend" was real and not insignificant. >Hence, spending was down. I'm not convinced things would have been >the same had Clinton a friendly Congress. Yeah, nationalizing the nation's health care system will do that .... JDG _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
