> It's not the munitions the soldiers are concerned
> with; it's defense. 
> They have, essentially, none.

That's not entirely true. The Army has plenty of
Bradleys and Abrams over there, and both vehicles are
proving to be very survivable against all manner of
manpack anti-tank weapons. In fact, so much so that
the Army is rethinking some of the tactics it uses in
urban combat (it used to be you would dismount all
your infantry and send them in first to supress
possible ambush sites, locate the enemy, etc; this was
because armored vehicles had previously been very
vulnerable to manpack AT weapons -- something the
Brad's and Abrams' are proving very resistant to).

Even the Interceptor body armor is redefining small
unit tactics.

The problem, rather (or the gripes) are not with these
vehicles, but with rear etchelon vehicles that
normally see no combat. Given that Bush & co thought
Iraq would be a "slam dunk" its reasonable that they
wouldn't armor trucks hauling beans & bullets. But the
character of the conflict means that, like Vietnam,
there are no front lines...

My question is why can't in-country engineer units
just scab the armor on like they are doing now (though
arguably with higher quality -- and probably lighter
and more durable -- armor plate supplied from
stateside manufacturers?). The Army and other branches
have a long tradition of "field mods", such as crude
overhead armor on M10 and M36 tank destroyers in WWII,
or armor plate on trucks and jeeps in Vietnam. Might
not be an elegant solution, but its been proven to
work in the past...

Damon.


=====
------------------------------------------------------------
Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum."
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: Revell Germany's M60A3
------------------------------------------------------------


                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
The all-new My Yahoo! - What will yours do?
http://my.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to