Dan said: > If it is the former, then different words may have > been helpful.
I apologize. sincerely. (I have not yet read the next two messages. I had already decided to do this.) If John is good at pressing my buttons, it's not so much his fault as mine. I am sure he does not see his rationalizations as sophistries, or evnvision himself as supporting the monstrously unsupportable. Moreover, I can see that I may be viewed as overbearing, dramatic, short-tempered, dramatic, and dramatic. But I have children. And I am loyal to a version of a decent, moral, honest, agile and COMPETENT Pax Americana that can accomplish many of the goals that the neocons CLAIM they are trying to achieve in order to spread democracy and prosperity around the globe. The same neocons who are doing everything with levels of outrageous incompetence and howling stupidity that will kill not only Pax Americana but America itself. Morons who have fallen for the worst trap since Vietnam tore this country apart, following a president who is owned and operated by evildoers who are bent on our destruction. So Dan, I am NOT inviting John to leave Brin-l. It is more his than mine. I am simply inviting him to state his case without addressing me when I state mine. Not because I fear debating him. (I feel that I generally win.) But because I do not have the time. I pray that my fellow citizens will have the wisdom to marginalize the monsters and force John to pick other heroes. From a genuine american conservatism that does not tear at our marrow like a raging cancer. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
