Richard Baker wrote:
>
> Which is not to say that Mendel wasn't an excellent scientist; 
>
But he wasn't. His published figures are too good to be real:
they don't pass a Chi-Square test, meaning that he adjusted
them to look better than what he found in his experiments :-)

Alberto Monteiro

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to