The Fool wrote: > > Whatever popists may believe--or say they believe--It is mathematically > impossible to prove the existence of Dog. Therefor any and all things > attributed to said deit(y|ies) is supposition. Because their no > mathematical way to prove the existence of said deit(y|ies) it is > mathematically impossible to prove any thought, action, feeling, belief, > attribute, desire, or speech, of the unproven deit(y|ies). > You have never dealt with any advanced mathematics, have you?
It's perfectly normal in mathematics to suppose something - without proving its existence - and then inferring properties for such mathematical object. In fact, it's the most straightforward way to prove the _non-existence_ of something if we start by assuming its existence, and then drawing absurd results from that. What religious atheists should be doing right now is this, to turn Atheism from just another theology into Science :-P "Let's define "god" as (A1), (A2), .... Lemma: If there are infinite gods, then (L1), (L2), ... Lemma: if there are two gods G1 and G2, then (L3), (L4), ... etc" Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
