JDG wrote:
>
> At 04:53 PM 8/9/2004 +0000 Alberto Monteiro wrote:
> >> Because in my (and many other people's) opinion, opposing
> >> contraception is a bad idea that would drastically lower the
> >> quality of life for almost everyone. If God opposes all
> >> contraception, then that suggests a God with very little
> >> understanding, compassion, or empathy for the human condition.
> >> If that's true, then we're all thoroughly screwed. So,
> >> "inconceivable" wouldn't be the right word, but "terrifying" might.
> >>
> >But the Catholic church is _not_ against contraception [ok: maybe
> >it's time to cut some of many negatives in this sentence!]. They
> >fiercely propose one 100% effective way of contraception: sexual
> >abstinence!
>
> Thank you.
>
> It is worth noting that there are an awful lot of 1, 2, and 3-child
> Catholic families thanks to NFP.
3 is quite enough at times, believe me.
Especially when all 3 want Mommy-comforting at the same time. (I left
the two not in the direst need to theur grandma's ministrations and am
holding the other, typing one-handed while moving to music to help
soothe her....)
NFP can definitely be useful for spacing children. (An airlock leading
to vacuum is also useful for spacing them in a thoroughly different
sense.)
Julia
tried a total of 3 months of her life to get pregnant, and has 3
children
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
