At 09:27 AM 4/28/2004 -0500 Dan Minette wrote: >Science is not all cut and dry. There are a number of global climate >models, that have uncertainties in them. Global warming hawks tend to >favor models that discuss about 3-4C increases in global temperature due to >human activity over the next 50-100 years, while global warming doves ten >to favor models that are more in the 1C-1.5C range. The most likely >results are somewhere in between. Publishing both papers is a normal part >of good science.
I thought that good science required precision to multiple decimal points??? ;-)
Sometimes in science the best you can do is an order-of-magnitude estimate (i.e., getting the power of 10 right), and sometimes that's only if you're lucky . . .
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
