David Hobby makes the debatable point: > I've often wondered about this idea of "winning" a debate. > Some people seem to actually judge the winner on the basis of > snappy lines like the following, regardless of the facts: > > "I KNEW Jack Kennedy, and you're no Jack Kennedy." > > "If it quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, ... then it > is a duck." (Sorry about the mess I made of the last one!)
Maybe we can have a Special Debating Olympics and then you can be a winner too.
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
