On 5/11/04 10:04 PM, "William T Goodall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In other words, to the America that the New York Times addresses,
> redneck still means bigot and - this is not putting it too strongly -
> pervert. What would have clinched the dismissal of the Abu Ghraib
> incidents as the excesses of people whom enlightened America despises
> was the specifically sexual element of degradation."
> 
> "If the US Army is now recruiting no-hopers from its social swamps,
> then it must come to terms with the fact that they, too, are Americans,
> who are prepared to die for their country - however alien their idea of
> it may be to their condescending countrymen."

But don't people in New York and San Francisco pay a lot of money to people
who will abuse them and put them on leashes?

Just a thought,
Matthew Bos

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to