----- Original Message ----- From: "Nick Arnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Pseudonymous postings from the Netherlands
> Deborah Harrell wrote: > > > If your supposition is correct, I agree; people are > > capable of change, and should be allowed to > > demonstrate that. > > Certainly. Elsewhere. > Subscribing under a pseudonym doesn't demonstrate positive change to me. I agree with that. I think that allowing someone to think they won, not by repenting of the threats and attacks made in the past, but by gaming the list administrator is not a good way to deal with someone who was banned for good cause. > In a moderated message, "John Doe" says he's "holding off on > answering" my direct question about his identify, so I'm going to assume > that he is the person I suspected. It's your call, but I think it would be prudent to hold off letting John Doe return until you explicitly wish to make the decision. Letting someone sneak around the ban sounds like having your hand forced. Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
