Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> >Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:43:28 -0600
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:26 PM
> >Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> >
> >
> > > Robert Seeberger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:25 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> > > >
> > > > > Democrats 'sex-crazed
> > > > > pantywaists.' :P
> > > >
> > > > Shouldn't the "sex crazed" have their panties 'round their knees?
> > > > At the least?
> > >
> > > Ankles are better. Even better is flung across the room so they end
> >up
> > > hanging half-off the TV.
> > >
> >
> >But hopefully not sticking to the wall.
> >
>
> Better to simply go commando, which eliminates the need to remove them
> entirely. :D
Well, I'd really prefer a cotton knit right next to my skin there than
denim.
Maybe that's just me.
Then there's the trick where you remove your underwear without removing
the shorts you're wearing over them. If you're not wearing underwear,
you can't do that trick. :)
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
