Perhaps it is a biased standard, but I see it a bit differently. First let me clarify that
I'm not arguing that JDG's (or anyone else's) arguments should not be criticized or
addressed vehemently if desired/necessary, but rather that I'm generally against rude
or insulting posts intended to get a person to shut up or unsubscribe to the list. (The
latter is what I thought Tom was possibly advocating, though reading subsequent posts
by him, I think that wasn't really his point).


It wasn't my point at all! My point in fact was the complete opposite: that no one should take even the roughest debate on this list as anything other than vigorous debate; at least in my case. No matter how much I may dispute someone else's arguments, that's all I'm doing. I don't even know anyone on this list personally, so I'm certainly not attacking them. And I don't take it personally when anyone takes a whack at what I say here. I commend some thicker skin to everyone else - and a bit of forebearance. This is supposed to be for fun - even as we go back and forth, let's keep that in mind.


------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------


Tom Beck

my LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/tomfodw/

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never thought I'd see the last." - Dr. Jerry Pournelle

------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to