--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Damon Agretto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also heavily disagree with his assertation that > Freedom of Speech defends one's right to use crude > language or show inappropriate material where it may > be exposed to minors. I think hiding behind this > element of the Constitution is disgusting and > demeaning to the purpose of that article.
Well then, would it be inapropriate for me to ask you to please provide the definition of "Free" and "Speech" which allows "freedom of speech" to align with your doctrin? Also, why would a persons age, or rather why should a persons age have anthing to do with their possible exposure? _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
