Erik Reuter wrote: > >> "I'm sure that it is possible..... unmarried couples can have >> children. Homosexual couples are of course physically capable of >> adoption. Nevertheless, homosexual unions do not naturally produce >> children the way heterosexual unions do. Moreover, the question >> becomes - should we *incentivise* homosexual couples having children. >> I argue that we should not." > > You know, a lesbian couple could have BOTH members impregnated by > artificial insemination. They could produce children at TWICE THE RATE > of a heterosexual couple. > You are completely wrong in your arguments. This is nonsense. What is the benefit of producing children at twice the rate?
> Alternatively, a lesbian couple could pair with a compatible gay male > couple, and sperm from both men could be inserted inside both women. > One child could live with the men and one with the women (assuming they > don't all want to live together in one house). The children could grow > up knowing all of their parents. Sounds healthy and happy to me. > No, this is wrong and evil. But, OTOH, lesbians should be _incentivated_ to have children. The reason is simple: heterosexual women chose the father of their children based on primate instincts that are quite obsole and archaic, and that do not produce an improvement of the Human race. Lesbians would chose the father of the children only based on the quality of the DNA, and this would _greatly_ improve Humanity. I think all heterosexual woman should be sterilized and only lesbians should be allowed to have children. Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
