On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:33:54PM -0600, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
> At 06:24 PM 2/17/04, Chad Cooper wrote:
>
> >When I replace "Gay" and "Homosexual" with Interracial, replace "sex" with
> >"race", and "heterosexual" as "same-race"......
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >Chad's Modified text example below
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> >...snip for brevity...
> >
> >3) interracial unions are ill-suited for the siring and raising of the next
> >generation. By definition, interracial unions are infertile.
>
>
> Kinda falls apart here, doesn't it?
Not if you consider inter-racial progeny to be sub-human, then they are infertile in that they don't produce full humans.
Has anybody here said that, other than you just now?
Not unlike saying that artificial insemination does not count for lesbian couples.
Did anyone say that it does not count? John said that he "does not believe in it", which I presume is because the Catholic church discourages it. AFAIK, the Catholic church does not teach that babies born through IVF are sub-human, or indeed anything but fully human. (If I am wrong on this, I'd appreciate correction from someone who knows what the Catholic church teaches.)
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
