At 10:52 PM 12/23/2003 -0600 Robert Seeberger wrote:
>I think the point Tom is riffing on is that Rush has repeatedly
>claimed that there is no constitutional right to privacy.
>That would likely apply also to medical records.
Why does arguing that there is no constitution right to privacy to have
abortions or homosexual relationships at all apply to the execution of the
laws of Florida regarding medical records?
Or more generally, what is so inconsistent about saying that there is no
right to privacy to have an abortion or a homosexual relationship, but that
there is a right to privacy that protects one from a government's
unreasonable search of your medical records?
It is not at all evident to me that there is a position on one necessitates
a position on the other.
JDG - Who has no arguments, nor any apologies.
_______________________________________________________
John D. Giorgis - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world,
it is God's gift to humanity." - George W. Bush 1/29/03
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
