<<http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A9708-2003Nov6?language=printer
>>

White House Puts Limits on Queries From Democrats 


By Dana Milbank
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, November 7, 2003; Page A29 


The Bush White House, irritated by pesky questions from congressional
Democrats about how the administration is using taxpayer money, has
developed an efficient solution: It will not entertain any more questions
from opposition lawmakers. 

The decision -- one that Democrats and scholars said is highly unusual --
was announced in an e-mail sent Wednesday to the staff of the House and
Senate Appropriations Committees. House committee Democrats had just
asked for information about how much the White House spent making and
installing the "Mission Accomplished" banner for President Bush's May 1
speech aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln.

The director of the White House Office of Administration, Timothy A.
Campen, sent an e-mail titled "congressional questions" to majority and
minority staff on the House and Senate Appropriations panels. Expressing
"the need to add a bit of structure to the Q&A process," he wrote: "Given
the increase in the number and types of requests we are beginning to
receive from the House and Senate, and in deference to the various
committee chairmen and our desire to better coordinate these requests, I
am asking that all requests for information and materials be coordinated
through the committee chairmen and be put in writing from the committee."


He said this would limit "duplicate requests" and help answer questions
"in a timely fashion." 

It would also do another thing: prevent Democrats from getting questions
answered without the blessing of the GOP committee chairmen. 

"It's saying we're not going to allow the opposition party to ask
questions about the way we use tax money," said R. Scott Lilly,
Democratic staff director for the House committee. "As far as I know,
this is without modern precedent."

Norman Ornstein, a congressional specialist at the American Enterprise
Institute, agreed. "I have not heard of anything like that happening
before," he said. "This is obviously an excuse to avoid providing
information about some of the things the Democrats are asking for."

Campen's e-mail wording suggests the policy may extend to other inquiries
about the functioning of the Executive Office of the President, but the
immediate targets were the spending committees. For years, those panels
had a strong bipartisan tradition in which the majority party generally
joined the minority in tough oversight of the administration.

Brookings Institution government scholar Thomas Mann said the Democrats
have little ability to challenge the decision. "This is just one of many
instances where Republicans have a legal basis for what they're doing,
but it violates long-standing norms," he said. All the Democrats can do,
he said, "is carp." 

The White House said it is in discussions to reach an amicable
compromise. "There have been staff-level discussions about ways to better
coordinate requests from Congress," said spokeswoman Ashley Snee. "It was
not the intent to suggest minority members should not ask questions
without the consent of the majority."


----
I Pledge Impertinence to the Flag-Waving of the Unindicted
Co-Conspirators of America
and to the Republicans for which I can't stand
one Abomination, Underhanded Fraud
Indefensible
with Liberty and Justice Forget it.

 -Life in Hell (Matt Groening)

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to