On 20 Oct 2003 at 9:11, William T Goodall wrote: > > On Monday, October 20, 2003, at 03:53 am, Andrew Crystall wrote: > > > On 20 Oct 2003 at 1:03, William T Goodall wrote: > > > >> > >> On Saturday, October 18, 2003, at 04:52 pm, Andrew Crystall wrote: > >> > >>> On 18 Oct 2003 at 9:48, William T Goodall wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Saturday, October 18, 2003, at 04:35 am, Doug Pensinger > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> So I'm assuming, after reading this: > >>>>> http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,112983,00.asp, that I > >>>>> can't play tunes downloaded from ITunes on my Musicmatch > >>>>> jukebox? > >>>>> > >>>>> So much for ITunes. 8^P > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> I think the idea is to use iTunes as the player instead of > >>>> whatever inferior software you were previously hampered by :) > >>> > >>> Except the iTunes software is BADLY inferior to a lot of the > >>> players out there which use deacent codec's. I've seen a waveform > >>> analysis, thanks. > >> > >> Really? > > > > Yes. It was run in the media lab of Salford University. I'll see if > > I can pry a copy from my friend who works in there, but I'm not sure > > if I can (well, rather if he's allowed to). > > > > There is this: > > http://audio.ciara.us/test/aac128test/results.html > > "QuickTime is a clear winner, performing much better than the > competition. Sorenson Squeeze, Psytel AACenc and Nero are tied, with > Sorenson slightly higher than the others. Faac is clearly the worst."
Listening test? Right. I'm talking about actual waveform analysis compared to the origional sound. Andy Dawn Falcon _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
