Jan Coffey wrote:
>
> I am sure we will all agree this algorithum is somewhat flawed. In practice,
> only half were acurate.
>
> This algorithum does not seem to work. In practice it was acuate only %50 of
> the time.
What's interesting is that it had me pegged correctly for 70% of my
responses, while normally gender sorters get me wrong at least 55% of
the time. How's that for a data point? :) Certainly doesn't hurt your
argument....
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
