> From: Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> >From: "The Fool"

> > > From: Jon Gabriel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Disinfopedia_Main_Page
> > > >
> > > > Welcome to Disinfopedia, a collaborative project to produce a
> > > directory
> > > > of public relations firms, think tanks, industry-funded
organizations
> > > and
> > > > industry-friendly experts that work to influence public opinion
and
> > > > public policy on behalf of corporations, governments and special
> > > > interests. We are already working on 1614 articles.
> > >
> > >
> > > The site would have much more credibility in my eyes if it weren't
> > > associated with PRWatch.  They vilify all PR professionals
regardless
> >of
> > > merit.
> >
> >Because _ALL_ PR is Propaganda?  Because all PR professionals are
> >Propagandists?
> 
> Well to answer your extreme answer with a more reasoned response, no it

> isn't and no they aren't, unless you are referring to the general
public as 
> an "institution".
> 
> A large portion of the work that PR professionals do keeps the media
and by 
> extension the public informed and educated about specific topics and
are 

'Propagandized'.

> _not_ aimed at promoting disinformation.

Propagandanda doesn't necessarilly = disinformation, but it is still
propaganda no less.

>  For example, almost all of what is 
> released to the public from the scientific community (for example)
contains 
> absolutely no 'spin' or hype.

Heliocentric propaganda.  All scientists really know the earth is flat.
When lord Wotan stikes down the blasphemers...

> I suppose this will all fall on deaf ears... you seem much more likely
to 
> condemn first and not bother to ask questions later, but I suggest you
try 
> learning about the industry in all its forms before condemning us as a
whole 
> with a single stereotype.

Sorry, but I have no sympathy whatsoever for these people.

> >There can be no merit whatsoever in any propaganda
> >department or in any professional propagandists.
> 
> I won't deny that PR people across many fields do influence public
opinion 
> and spin stories to place their clients in a better light.  Your lack
of 
> knowledge of our industry coupled with your own personal biases deserve
to 
> be pointed out, imo.

Your personal biases also deserve to be pointed out.

> >I do not accept your
> >claim.
> 
> As Darwin said, "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does 
> knowledge."  Quite frankly, your acceptance isn't required.  You're not

> speaking from a knowledgeable position regarding the industry, so why
should 
> it matter?

You're not speaking from an unbiased position either.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to