Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
No. On the flip side, if I'm a law-abiding citizen who knows how to handle and use a gun, should I be relegated to second-class status because I choose to own and carry a gun?
From an earlier post of mine:
All that being said, there are too much a cult of arms in this country to make firearms illegal. Though the courts have ruled that the second amendment does not allow unlimited access to firearms people continue to believe that deadly force is their right. So be it. What we need to do is to encourage responsibility with the law. Weapons should be registered. Owners should be trained. Penalties for abuse should be persuasive. And the laws should be homogenous so that individuals can't skirt them by driving a few miles.
How about if we change Jan's statement to something like:
C) everyone [who wants to own a gun and who has not been convicted of a violent crime or diagnosed with a serious mental or emotional illness] should [be allowed to choose to] have a gun.
Can we all agree with that?
Subject to reasonable regulation, sure. I would hope we work diligently to create a society that doesn't feel it needs such deadly force,
I agree wholeheartedly.
So what do you (or anyone on the list) recommend that we do to prevent those who now choose to commit crimes from making that decision and acting on it in the first place, so the law-abiding, innocent citizens like Debbi won't need to defend themselves and their loved ones from criminals?
-- Ronn! :)
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
