--- Erik Reuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 01:03:06AM -0700, Jan Coffey wrote:
>
> > Explain how the responses you have made above do not fall firmly in
> > line with passive agressiveness.
>
> Explain how they do? I don't see it.
>
>
If you don't see how
>There aren't any dummies reading Killer B's, someone once said. They'll
> get it eventually.
>
and
> Good! There's nothing wrong with a little ambiguity and contrast.
are not 100% in line with passive agressivenes then I really don't know who
to begin to explain it to you. From past experiences I also know that you
will pick apart my explination until you have exosted my (or anyone elses)
intrest. And then go on believing yourself to be in the right when no one
else does. So why don't we just skip to that point now and save ourselves the
hassle.
let me just say though that purpously being ambiguous for any reason other
than humor or flirtation is generaly precieved as a form of PA.
=====
_________________________________________________
Jan William Coffey
_________________________________________________
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
