> >Which of course is what
> this all about. So many Democrats turned a blind
> >> eye to Clinton's
> perjury
> >
> >But this is where you are precisely wrong John. No democrat
> defended
> > Clinton this. Not one said he was right
>
> Au contraire.... a great many noted that "any man would lie about adultery."
>
> JDG
Yes, but that doesn't make it "right", just "understandable".
So the comment stands: "Not one said he was right."
To me, the big difference is that Clinton was attacked
because of his PERSONAL life, while Bush is being attacked about
his PROFESSIONAL life.
Given his past use of illegal drugs, I find it deeply
hypocritical that Bush does not push for reduced penalties for
their use. (While his position seems now to be that his past
drug use was wrong, he is then asking to be forgiven for it.
Why should this forgiveness not be extended to present users?)
But this is an example of an attack based on Bush's personal
life.
---David
Toot,toot!
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
