> Nevertheless, I would hope that everyone would be in favor of the second 
> half.� I think that this issue is so important and controversial that it should 
> be decided by the State Legislatures and Congress, which are elected by the 
> people, and not written by unelected judges.
> 

As will hardly surprise anyone, I could not possibly disagree more. By this 
logic, the Supreme Court should not have decided as it did in Brown vs Board of 
Education. If it were left up to states, there would still be legal 
discrimination in the deep South, almost 50 years after Brown. Rights are rights; they 
should not be at the mercy of transitory or even entrenched prejudiced 
majorities. It has been the province of the Supreme Court for 200 years to rule on 
the constitutionality of laws. A conservative, of all people, should respect 
that kind of established tradition. 

The article cited is also factually wrong, as well as philosophically 
wrongheaded. Marriage has not historically been about procreation; or, at least, not 
only about procreation. If that were so, sterile people would not be allowed 
to marry. Marriage has been about many things: property, honor, dynastic 
unions, balance of power, etc. The kind of nuclear family beloved of the Christian 
Right has not existed in this form for most of human history. To fetishize it - 
and to use this fiction as a means to beat up gay people (figuratively, 
although they certainly get beat up literally too by those enflamed by the 
prejudice encompassed in such articles) - is to violate historical truth in the 
service of an unworthy attempt to capitalize on some people's bias. Prejudices 
should be fought, not pandered to. 

Permitting gay people to marry legally does not do the slightest thing to 
infringe upon the rights of anyone else, despite the Christian Right's hysterical 
delusion that "the family" is somehow threatened by the idea. 

The family is not in any danger. The Constitution, however, might be. An 
amendment barring gay marriage is unnecessary and unworthy of even being 
considered. It purports to solve a nonexistent problem. It is shameful.



Tom Beck

www.prydonians.org
www.mercerjewishsingles.org

"I always knew I'd see the first man on the Moon. I never dreamed I'd see the 
last." - Dr Jerry Pournelle
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to