Julia Thompson wrote:
Michael Harney wrote:


My thought on the whole "companies owning too many stations" thing is:  Who
cares?  First off it will expand diversity, not limit it, because stations
owned by the same company are going to target different demographics so that
the stations are not competing with one another.  What would be the point?
Take USA and Sci-fi channel, both owned by the same parent company.  There
is a small degree of overlap, but only where the genres overlap.  USA is
primaily suspense and action stuff while Sci-fi is... well Sci-Fi.  As long
as there are enough channels for local interest, public access, etc. (and
come on now, with digital cable and satelite service going up everywhere in
the USA, we are in no danger of running out of channels), then what does it
matter if one company ownes a bucket-full of stations in a varitable sea of
stations.


Unless you get the same bunch of people clueless about the different
demographics making all the programming decisions....


The Fifth Estate used to help keep government and industry honest. They have been effectively co-opted.

Doug


_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to