"Ronn!Blankenship" wrote:
>
> At 10:34 PM 3/30/03 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> >Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >
> > > This theory actually dovetails with part of His essay
> > > on Neotany: the "elk-man" would lack any of these
> > > "sensitivity" alleles [SS], the "swan-man" would be
> > > heterozygous [Ss], and the gay would be homozygous
> > > recessive [ss]. Although there might be several genes
> > > that contribute - frex 'sensitivity,' 'tenderness,'
> > > and 'empathy,' so that a range of "elk" => "swan" =>
> > > gay exists.
> > >
> > > Don't Forget 'Color Coordination' Maru ;)
> >
> >Hey, as long as you've got a good eye for *line*, that's what *really*
> >matters. Anything that can be done nicely in black will look good on a
> >certain portion of the population.... ;)
>
> Isn't the standard Afghani burqa black?
Yeah, but there's not a whole lot you can do with *line* on that. It's
relatively shapeless. Now, a dress that's tight down to the waist, and
then flares out, that's something more along the lines of what I was
thinking.
> > Julia
> >
> >who looks good in black
>
> No Comment Maru
The great thing about it is that between Labor Day and Memorial Day, if I
have to go to something somewhat formal in the evening other than a
wedding, all I have to have is, say, 3 different black dresses, and *one*
of them will do nicely, and mixing and matching accessories gives me a
number of different "looks". No other color is quite that flexible.
Well, maybe red, but I don't look so good in red....
Julia
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
