On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 02:27:56PM +0000, Richard Baker wrote: > seems to me to expressly prohibit the "under God", so I think that the > First Amendment is certainly relevant.
I didn't say it was irrelevant, I said it was shallow. The 1st amendment has bigger fish to fry. And now I'll stop discussing it, because it is a silly waste of time. -- "Erik Reuter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.erikreuter.net/ _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
