> I was referring to the US being inconsistent when it comes to
> making sure that UN resolutions are carried out. The US demands
> that Iraq abides by UN resolutions, and says it will use
> military force if Iraq doesn't comply. However, I know a
> certain country that after decades still isn't abiding by an UN
> resolution
> I think you know very well which resolution and country I'm
> talking about.
OK, maybe *he* knows, but I'm totally clueless. Would you be so
kind as to fill *me* in, at least? And maybe anyone else who
might be similarly clueless? Thank you.
Based on the UN Web site:
http://www.un.org/News/ossg/sanction.htm
unless he is confusing United Nations' non-mandatory Chapter VI
resolutions with enforceable Chapter VII resolutions, he is referring
to resolutions concerning one of these countries:
Afghanistan, Iraq, Liberia, Libya, Rwanda, Sierra Leone, or Somalia
The US has done many bad things over the past two centuries, and I
won't be surprised if there are minor inconsistencies, but I do not
know of major US inconsistencies in its dealings with any of these
seven countries. Inadequacies, yes, but inconsistencies, no.
--
Robert J. Chassell Rattlesnake Enterprises
http://www.rattlesnake.com GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
http://www.teak.cc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
