--- Russell Chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Deborah Harrell wrote:
> 
> >Why equate "war protester" with "pro-Saddam?!" -
> >again, the vast majority of those I know who
> "protest
> >the war" do so _because they think an international
> >coalition ought to be made_ to prosecute it (OK,
> one that involves the UN), not b/c they think SH is
> >anything other than a slime-ball.
> >
> Which was fine when a UN sanction was likely. But
> now we face a 
> different reality. In this new reality, Saddam has
> played the western 
> press, the anti-globalists and the retreating
> Europeans with masterful 
> skill, and has probably defeated any chance of a UN
> action to disarm him.
> Now that the UN is not likely to get involved, but
> the US, Britain and 
> Australia are, then "war protesters" are supporting
> Saddam.
> 
> Either we support his removal, or we support his
> continuing reign - we 
> can't just say "Oh, if only there was another way"

Please see my 9K post sent tonight this thread;  if
the Admin *has* evidence clearly linking Saddam to
9/11, war would instantly be justified.  Is
interrogating the just-captured al-Qaida 'mastermind'
likely to turn up such a link?  Is waiting a week or 2
for him to crack such a sacrifice?  In the meantime,
what's so wrong with letting SH destroy some of his
arsenal while the hammer of the US military hangs over
his head?

<grim>  Will there be a need for US troops to be
elsewhere in the very near future? I fervently hope
not; I'm not 'up' on the North Korean issue - maybe
Kim's only playing a daring and well-timed game of
"chicken"** - but it seems to me that that ought to be
considered.

Debbi
** for non-Yangs, "chicken" is a stupid adolescent
game in which two drivers race their cars directly at
each other; he who swerves first (ie. "chickens out")
is the loser

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to