--- Gautam Mukunda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > All of the folks I know who want 'more proof' or a
> > 'UN-sanctioned international coalition' before war
> > is declared think Saddam is a monster...<snip>
> 
> But it's interesting, isn't it, that this doesn't
> seem
> to excite them at all.  I live in New York, I saw
> the
> protests, and I read plenty of stuff the anti-war
> people put out... <snip>

I can only say that all those _I_ know (friends,
colleagues, family) who would support a UN coalition
against Iraq certainly condemn Saddam.  Of course,
none are members of ANSWER nor have they marched
(written letters, yes).

> > Why equate "war protester" with "pro-Saddam?!" -
> > again, the vast majority of those I know who
> > "protest
> > the war" do so _because they think an
> international
> > coalition ought to be made_ to prosecute it (OK,
> one
> > that involves the UN), not b/c they think SH is
> > anything other than a slime-ball.
> 
> But that's a fantasy, and we know it's a fantasy, so
> it's equivalent to saying they want Mahatma Gandhi
> to get up out of his grave and give the war its
> blessing.

<snort>
Overstatement.  A coalition was forged before, so it
can be again.  Will it be easy?  No. But that's not a
reason not to try.

>  First, the argument that the agreement of
> dictatorial
> China, amoral France, and well, whatever the hell
> Russia is right now, gives some sort of moral stamp
> to overthrowing someone like Hussein is absurd.

No, of course not moral - just practical.  
 
> Second,
> the national interests of France (as the French
> government currently interprets them) mean that we
> aren't going to get that - so why, instead of
> protesting the US, aren't there hundreds of
> thousands
> of people burning French flags for supporting
> someone like Hussein?  

Because most people don't know that France helped SH
build a nuclear reactor?  I hesitate to use the term
"war of words," but I don't think that a good _public_
case of how France/Russia is benefited by SH's
continuance has been put forth by the Admin.  It isn't
enough for the Admin to believe that they have a case
- they need to convince the American (and preferably
world) public.  That blunders have been made in this
'game' of perception/appearance has not helped their
case (frex, claiming to have evidence of SH'
involvement in 9/11, then later the 'informant' is
discredited).

>It's not like this is an aberration -
> they've been doing it for decades.  So why isn't
> that
> getting people excited?  Again, it's suggestive.

Suggestive of what?  Not being informed?  Not having
the facts?  Not trusting what they've been told
recently because prior claims have been dismissed?
 
> You can say "this ought to happen" or "that ought to
> happen" as much as you want.  They are not, in fact,
> going to happen.  One of the markers of sanity is
> seeing the world as it actually is, not as you wish
> it were.  

<grin>  *Your* definition, not mine.  To desire a
better world is the basis for many improvements.  Or
do you dismiss those who "have a dream?"  Gandhi and
MLK decided that they didn't want their worlds to
continue unchanged - so they worked towards that
change.  [Note that I *am not* equating their work of
improved social justice to war/not-war WRT Iraq --
only your statement that what "ought"  is "not, in
fact, going to happen."  Because sometimes it does.]

>So this is the world as it is.  Countries are
> self-interested.  Some of them perceive their
> self-interest as protecting Saddam.  The US thinks
> its self-interest is in overthrowing Saddam. 
> Overthrowing
> Saddam would be A Good Thing.  The moral thing.  So
> American interests (as they often are) are in
> consonance with the demands of abstract morality,
> and
> French interests (among others) are opposed to that
> morality.  But it's the _US_ people are protesting? 
> What does that tell you?

Several things - chief among them, a poorly-waged "war
of words" (see also my prior post about squandering
the goodwill of many peoples).  Also, that as the
bigshot, the US must be 'like Caesar's wife above
reproach' - not that that's fair, but that's the way
it is.
 
> > I am genuinely puzzled by the "but turn a blind
> eye to the vastly larger faults of those who oppose
> > her,"
> > Gautam, because I really don't know *anyone* who
> > thinks that way.  I am certainly among those _who
> > expect America to hold to a higher moral standard_
> > because - well, because we're *supposed* to be
> > morally
> > superior to the nasty dictators of the world! 
<snipped rest of my "idealized sheriff" statement> 
> 
> But, well, Debbi, I do know lots of people who are
> that way.  Most of them seem to oppose the war.  And
> the behavior crops up a lot.

Fair enough.

>  For example, I think you
> made a rather snarky comment about how "our hands
> aren't clean" with regards to supporting Saddam. 

<grin> Nah, if I'd wanted to be snarky I would have
chosen much more inflammatory language!

> Now,
> that's true.  But there's a huge difference between
> the fairly minor aid that we gave him, and the
> enormous support that he got from, say, France and
> Germany.  So why the comment? 

Bluntly, because I find the "holier than thou"
attitude WRT the-US-vs.-the-world foolish,
condescending, and most of all **counterproductive to
the stated goals** of the government.  It's one thing
to claim to be better (which we are), another
_entirely_ to state that one has both God's ear and
His mission --which happens also to be the claim of
certain Muslim extremists.  If this is presented as a
"holy war," it *will not* stay confined to Iraq. 

> If aide to Saddam
> disqualifies you from acting here, then it's not
> _us_
> who bear the vast majority of the moral taint, is
> it? 
<snipped rest of paragraph pertaining to above query> 

Umm, could you please rephrase this?  I'm not sure
what you're asking me...
(although I have already stated that I certainly do
not think the US is 'worse than Saddam' -- which is an
absurd position, and no one I know would say or even
think such foolishness)

Debbi

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to