De : Julia Thompson [mailto:julia@;zurg.net] >> > I haven't been reading the WSJ editorial page much recently, but my >> > husband has, and he's seen a fair bit of the following as of late: >> > >> >1) Arguments that France shouldn't be a permanent member of the UN >> >Security Council. >> > >> >2) Arguments for a somewhat new set of permanent UNSC members: US, >> >Russia, China, India and Japan.
From: "Jean-Louis Couturier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> How is Japan more important than the EU, especially security wise? De : Dan Minette [mailto:dsummersminet@;houston.rr.com] > The EU isn't a country. Of course it isn't. But it is enough of a political power that we should have at least one of its members sitting on the Security Council at all times. We could have a permanent seat for Europe where its members take turns. Europe would be represented but a country would be sitting on the council. Jean-Louis _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
