Hi Heinrich,

On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 at 04:15, Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 18.02.21 10:04, Ilias Apalodimas wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > An arch agnostic way was recently added on the kernel, as an alternative 
> > method
> > to load an initrd [1].  The kernel call to the firmware ends up calling the
> > protocol with a Device Path End Structure, so the firmware must know which
> > initrd to load on the buffer the kernel provides.
> >
> > The protocol is currently implemented by U-boot and EDK2, which both
> > define a way of specifying the initrd to load.  We could use this protocol,
> > in order to provide vertical distros a way of loading (kernel, initrd) pairs
> > without GRUB.  In that case we need a common way for firmware 
> > implementations
> > to define and manage the initrd.  User space applications that control the 
> > boot
> > flow (e.g efibootmgr), should also be able to change the variable 
> > accordingly.
> >
> > Looking at the EFI spec and specifically § 3.1.3 Load Options, we can use 
> > the
> > FilePathList[] of the EFI_LOAD_OPTION, which is described as:
> >
> > "A packed array of UEFI device paths. The first element of the array is a
> > device path that describes the device and location of the Image for this
> > load option. The FilePathList[0] is specific to the device type. Other 
> > device
> > paths may optionally exist in the FilePathList, but their usage is OSV 
> > specific.
> > Each element in the array is variable length, and ends at the device path 
> > end
> > structure. Because the size of Description is arbitrary, this data structure
> > is not guaranteed to be aligned on a natural boundary. This data structure 
> > may
> > have to be copied to an aligned natural boundary before it is used."
> >
> > So FilePatrhList[1-n] are available for OS usage.  There are 3 ways we could
> > implement that. All 3 ways would allow us to specify multiple initrds (and 
> > we
> > could extend the same logic to DTBs, but that's a different discussion).
> > They all re-use the same idea,  prepend a VenMedia DP, which has a GUID. We 
> > can
> > then use that GUID to identify the filetype and behavior of the device 
> > paths.
> >
> > 1. Prepend a VenMedia Device Path in every initrd Device Path. In that case
> > FilePathList[] would look like this:
> >
> > Loaded Image device path - end node - VenMedia - Initrd DP - end node
> > - VenMedia - Initrd DP - end node - repeat
> >
> > 2. Prepend a VenMedia Device Path once. In that case FilePathList[] would 
> > look
> > like this:
> >
> > Loaded Image device path - end node - VenMedia - Initrd DP - end
> > instance - (repeat) - Initrd DP - end node - other DPs
> >
> > In this case we could use the VenMedia Vendor Defined Data to indicate
> > the number
> > of device paths that follow, although it's redundant, since each instance 
> > would
> > terminate on the Device Path End Structure.
> >
> > 3. Use Vendor Defined Data of the VenMedia device path and copy the initrd
> > device path(s) in there. In that case the Vendor Defined Data will it self
> > be in a device path format with all the initrds we want.
> >
> > Loaded Image device path - end node - VenMedia - end node - other DPs
>
> When passing the device path of the boot option to the EDK2
> implementation of
> EFI_DEVICE_PATH_TO_TEXT_PROTOCOL.ConvertDevicePathToText(), it will
> print out all array elements as comma separated list like
>
> HD(1,GPT,..,0x2000,0x200000)/File(\EFI\debian\shimaa64.efi),/VenMedia(00000001-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)/HD(2,GPT,..,0x2000,0x200000)/File(\initrd1),/VenMedia(00000001-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)/HD(2,GPT,..,0x2000,0x200000)/File(\initrd2)
>
> The device path end nodes of sub-type 0x01 are rendered as commas.
>
> With 1 and 2 this would show a readable output like above.

The above is not readable in my opinion. I really wonder about this
path that we are going down.

[..]

Regards,
Simon
_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture

Reply via email to