Address comments from Heinrich Schuchardt:
- Typo fixes
- Be specific to say "Devicetree Blob"
- Add comment on rationale for choosing EfiACPIReclaimMemory for DTB

Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <[email protected]>
---
 source/chapter2-uefi.rst | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source/chapter2-uefi.rst b/source/chapter2-uefi.rst
index c9c0101..066fefb 100644
--- a/source/chapter2-uefi.rst
+++ b/source/chapter2-uefi.rst
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ A UEFI system that complies with this specification may 
provide the additional
 tables via the EFI Configuration Table.
 
 Compliant systems are required to provide one, but not both, of the following
-tables.
+tables:
 
-- An Advanced Configuration and Power Interface [ACPI]_ table, or
+- an Advanced Configuration and Power Interface [ACPI]_ table, or
 - a Devicetree [DTSPEC]_ system description
 
 EBBR systems must not provide both ACPI and Devicetree
@@ -96,11 +96,13 @@ Devicetree
 ^^^^^^^^^^
 
 If firmware provides a Devicetree system description then it must be provided
-in Flattened Devicetree (DTB) format version 17 or higher as described in
+in Flattened Devicetree Blob (DTB) format version 17 or higher as described in
 [DTSPEC]_ § 5.1.
 The following GUID must be used in the EFI system table ([UEFI]_ § 4)
 to identify the DTB.
 The DTB must be contained in memory of type EfiACPIReclaimMemory.
+EfiACPIReclaimMemory was chosen to match the recommendation for ACPI
+tables which fulfill the same task as the DTB.
 
 .. code-block:: c
 
-- 
2.20.1

_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture

Reply via email to