On Wed, 5 Jun 2019 at 00:41, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote:
>
...

> It depends on what you mean by "OS provided".  The DTS files come from
> the Linux Kernel sources, full stop.

That is the mistake we should try to fix.

We have DT bindings, which define the contract between the OS on one
side, and the platform on the other side. This means it is the
platform's job to present a DT description that adheres to those
[stable] bindings.

Today's development model of developing DT bindings in lockstep with
the drivers, and then bundling DT files with the OS is completely
unsustainable, since it doesn't scale, and it demonstrably results in
DT bindings that get modified without any regard for devices that are
already in the field (MacchiatoBin is a good example).

So it doesn't really matter where the kernel *sources* come from, as
long as the platform provides its own DT, which does not change just
because the kernel changes.

It is already defined how the platform provides this DT on a UEFI
system, i.e., via a configuration table with a known GUID. How the
firmware popiulates this memory is an implementation detail: if it
wants to load it from a signed file in the file system, that is fine,
as long as it is not the OS providing this file to the firmware.

>  That doesn't mean they're embedded
> within the kernel image.  They're usually going to be pulled from the
> filesystem.
>
> --
> Tom
_______________________________________________
boot-architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture

Reply via email to