2011/6/13 Grant Likely <[email protected]>: > I'd also like to set up a bi-weekly conference call. I'll try to > schedule it in the afternoon(europe)/morning(north america) to play > nice with everyone's schedule. Right now I'm considering scheduling > it on Wednesdays, but I'm open to suggestions.
How does Thursday at 15:00UTC sound to everyone? Also, the boot architecture topic is now on the agenda[1] for the August Linaro meeting[2]. [1]https://wiki.linaro.org/Events/2011-08-LDS/Schedule [2]https://wiki.linaro.org/Events/2011-08-LDS g. > > Cheers, > g. > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Grant Likely <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Following up from the decisions made at UDS last month[1], we need to >> organize a boot architecture coordination meeting. Currently the >> proposal is to hold a meeting either as part of the Linaro platform >> sprint[2] in the week on August 1-5, 2011, or in the weekend between >> the platform sprint and the ARM Partners Meeting the week after. >> Personally, my preference is to schedule a full day meeting on Friday, >> Aug 5 as part of the platform sprint, but I'd like to get some >> feedback before settling on that date. >> >> [1] >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/linaro/+spec/linaro-kernel-o-bootarchitecture >> [2] https://wiki.linaro.org/Events/2011-08-LDS >> >> Right now I'm in the process of organizing the information and topics >> which were discussed during UDS and get them out onto the Linaro wiki. >> Expect to see some early draft documents showing up late this week or >> early next week. After that, I'm going to be soliciting feedback and >> help to make them reflect the priorities and requirements that Linux >> vendors, users and developers have for the boot architecture. By the >> time the Linaro platform sprint rolls around, we should have a solid >> set of documents covering both requirements and a draft boot >> architecture. At the boot architecture meeting, my goal is to first >> come to agreement on the general approach and draft design, second to >> make decisions about how the boot architecture fits in with existing >> technologies like Fastboot, UEFI and U-Boot, and third to kick off >> work on implementation and detailed design. >> >> In order to be successful, we need to make sure the appropriate people >> are involved. I've started by sending this email to the people who I >> know are interested in the topic, but I know I've missed folks. I'm >> also going to cc: the [email protected][3] for any >> boot architecture traffic. Please let me know if there is anybody >> else that I should be inviting. In addition to the meeting in August, >> I'm considering a regular boot architecture conference call as part of >> the document drafting process, so I'd like to put together a list of >> critical stakeholders by the end of next week. >> >> [3] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture >> -- >> Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. >> Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. >> > > > > -- > Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. > Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. > -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
