I guess the first thing I would do is build the same way with BJam. Do you get the same errors? If you _do_ get the same errors then bring up the issues on the regular boost-users mailing list. If you get different results (works with bjam but not Cmake) then maybe start a thread on this mailing list and let's see what might be the problem. _________________________________________________________ Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net BlueQuartz Software www.bluequartz.net Principal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Biddiscombe, John A. <biddi...@cscs.ch> wrote: >> The fact is that the latest branch (boost-1.41.0-cmake0) is pretty stable by >> now. > > > I am a little surprised because since I set the dashboard up in November, I > have been getting > > ========== Build: 1228 succeeded, 212 failed, 2 up-to-date, 25 skipped > ========== > > and no tests running due to the linker errors which cause the above fails. > > This has been run and submitted on a daily basis, so I didn't consider it to > be stable or ready yet. I found a few minor cmake issues early on but hoped > that after the list asked for volunteers for dashboards, someone might be > looking at them. > > JB > _______________________________________________ > Boost-cmake mailing list > Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake > _______________________________________________ Boost-cmake mailing list Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
