So, obviously I had to change the CMake 2.6.4. supplied
FindBoost.cmake. Are these updates in the Latest CMake 2.8.0?
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio
On Dec 4, 2009, at 12:43 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
Pulled the latest boost 1.41.0cmake0, compiled and installed. Then I
tried to have my CMake based project find Boost. As usual, this
failed. Using CMake 2.6.4 currently. Started debugging into the
FindBoost.cmake file and here is what I am finding out:
_boost_INCLUDE_SEARCH_DIRS =
/Users/Shared/Toolkits/boost-1_41/include;
/Users/Shared/Toolkits/boost-1_41;
C:/boost/include;
C:/boost;
/boost;
/sw/local/include
_boost_PATH_SUFFIXES =
boost-1_41;
boost-1_41_0;
Of course boost headers are installed into /Users/Shared/Toolkits/
boost-1_41/include/boost-1.41.0
So this piece of code renders that useless:
# Transform 1.35 => 1_35 and 1.36.0 => 1_36_0
IF(_boost_VER MATCHES "[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+")
STRING(REGEX REPLACE "([0-9]+)\\.([0-9]+)\\.([0-9]+)" "\\1_\\2_\\3"
_boost_BOOSTIFIED_VERSION ${_boost_VER})
ELSEIF(_boost_VER MATCHES "[0-9]+\\.[0-9]+")
STRING(REGEX REPLACE "([0-9]+)\\.([0-9]+)" "\\1_\\2"
_boost_BOOSTIFIED_VERSION ${_boost_VER})
ENDIF()
This was probably for the older versions of boost? Or maybe the ones
built with bjam? This is the first time actually trying to build
Boost with CMake. Not really a great start. If I look back at boost
1.36, 1.39 and 1.40 all built with BJam the include directory
follows the boost-1_XX pattern.
Was the deviation intentional? A bug in the Boost/CMake files?
Help is appreciated.
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson mike.jack...@bluequartz.net
BlueQuartz Software www.bluequartz.net
Principal Software Engineer Dayton, Ohio
_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
