troy d. straszheim wrote:
One thing that has changed since that discussion is
tests-as-first-class-targets: for boost, at least, the extra cost
in generation time and time-to-build is prohibitive, and the
regex-selection style of ctest (-R mylibrary) is more straightforward
and functional. (You get situations where you want to specify that certain
tests are run in order, and doing this with make-target-dependencies is
a big
hassle).
I forgot to include that this is my current opinion... this isn't implemented
in boost, and there are loose ends to think about there, like compile_fail type
tests. I've implemented it elsewhere though and like it.
-t
_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
