On Nov 3, 2008, at 9:25 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
on Fri Oct 31 2008, Michael Jackson <mike.jackson-AT-bluequartz.net>
wrote:
Well I think the downside to the current dependency graph generation
is that it is dependent on "me" including the proper depends in the
"module.cmake" file. I was looking at the "bcp" tool and thinking
that
this might be a better way of determining the dependency graph of
boost. It would be interesting to add code to the bcp tool to
generate
a ".dot" file based on its scan of the boost and libs directories.
IMO we'd be much better off in some ways if every library author
needed
to stay aware of which libraries were his (immediate) dependencies.
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
There is an updated graph at <http://www.bluequartz.net/
dependencies.pdf>
_________________________________________________________
Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.bluequartz.net
_______________________________________________
Boost-cmake mailing list
Boost-cmake@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-cmake
