Hello, I'm a volunteer about to add some packaging scripts for LibreOffice in pkgsrc [1], and as such, I asked on the IRC developer's channel if there was a problem if I used "The Document Foundation" as a vendor string for the resulting packages.
This is an extract of the exchanges I had on this channel: 11:30 < ftigeot> is there a policy on branding / the --with-vendor option ? 11:33 < ftigeot> would there be a problem if I use "The Document Foundation" in my packages ? 11:39 * ftigeot has just found http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TradeMark_Policy 11:40 < ftigeot> I will use The Document Foundation as vendor string 11:40 <@mmeeks> ftigeot: ho hum; if you are not the document foundation - don't do that. 11:40 <@mmeeks> ftigeot: I think that is the request of the branding guidelines. 11:40 <@mmeeks> ftigeot: TDF is only for TDF produced builds; LibreOffice is for everyone. 11:46 < ftigeot> mmeeks: the webpage says "You may use the Marks without prior written permission (subject to the following terms): 11:46 < ftigeot> 1. To refer to the LibreOffice software in substantially unmodified form. " 11:47 < ftigeot> with a definition of "substantially unmodified" which says the way I intend to package it is basically okay This is an extract of the TradeMark_Policy web page: You may use the Marks without prior written permission (subject to the following terms): 1. To refer to the LibreOffice software in substantially unmodified form. "Substantially unmodified" means built from the source code provided by TDF, possibly with minor modifications including but not limited to: the enabling or disabling of certain features by default, translations into other languages, changes required for compatibility with a particular operating system distribution, the inclusion of bug-fix patches, or the bundling of additional fonts, templates, artwork and extensions). The packaging scripts I am creating use the unmodified source code of LibreOffice and only change the default configuration options. According to the previously mentionned web page, the usage of "The Document Foundation" trademark is permitted in this case. According to Michael Meeks, it was not the intent of the Foundation to allow the usage of its brand in that case. Could this point be clarified ? If the usage of "The Document Foundation" trademark is not permitted for creating third-party packages, the information on the TradeMark_Policy webpage are contradictory. Thanks in advance for your answers [1] pkgsrc - http://www.pkgsrc.org/ - is a framework for building and packaging third-party software. It was originally created for NetBSD but is now supported on many systems, including Linux, MacOS X and Microsoft Windows (Interix) -- Francois Tigeot -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
