Linux for blind general discussion wrote: > Not sure what's so "non-official" about them, since they're packaged > by the Debian iso team.
They are non-official as is: non-free is not part of Debian. That's the uneasy middle-ground that Debian uses between the GNU approach which is to ban firmwares entirely (to the point of refusing to say that they exist), and installing non-free firmware by default without the user being aware at all that non-free firmware are a concern for our freedom. Samuel _______________________________________________ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
