most modern linux commands that are run from a shell (whether nushell or
bash or whatever) are already fairly powerful, and are easily adaptable
to creating tabular output, especially when more complex pipelines to do
that are encapsulated in a script.

probably more to the point, accessing any shell via http usually requires
a separate webserver process (shellinabox or gateone), is ajax-dependent
(ajaxterm), is a java client (mindterm), or some combination; the latter two
may render html that's weird enough to be unrecognizable by screen readers,
and the first requires a dedicated server. and all of these, along
with the general concepts of what are called "reverse shells", often
come with difficult and subtle security exposures.

since nushell is just a shell like any other, if your screen-reader setup
can parse the output of any other shell (like bash), it can similarly
parse the output of nushell, i would think. and using the relatively
well-secured ssh setup, could be just as effective.

On Sun, Oct 31, 2021 at 09:03:03AM -0700, Linux for blind general discussion 
wrote:
> I have a Partly Baked Idea (PBI) regarding shell access via HTML.  In reading 
> about nushell (https://www.nushell.sh), I was intrigued by the fact that many 
> of its commands (e.g., cal, ls) output data in tabular form.  This allows 
> other commands to process the data, making certain sorts of pipelines more 
> effective.
> 
> My PBI is that, if nushell were accessed via HTML, a screen reader could let 
> a blind user navigate the rows and columns of any tabular output.  I'd like 
> to get some early feedback on this idea.  Does anyone think it might be 
> useful?  What issues would need to be resolved?  (Inquiring gnomes need to 
> mine...)
> 
> - Rich Morin

_______________________________________________
Blinux-list mailing list
Blinux-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list

Reply via email to