LGTM2

On Tue, Jun 30, 2026, 5:36 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM1
>
> Please make sure the PRs land. (and delay shipping if the final round ends
> up changing the API shape)
>
> On Friday, June 26, 2026 at 1:31:35 AM UTC+2 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> I’ve resolved all spec issues raised in prior rounds of review. The PRs
>> received no more feedback for a couple weeks after the last review round,
>> so I raised a request in the WHATNOT call today asking for any final
>> feedback. Anne said he’d take another look so just waiting on that.
>>
>>
>>
>> In that discussion Olli from Mozilla asked I make sure the test coverage
>> was complete. I think the existing test coverage is solid but am working on
>> adding one specific case he asked for in
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/8007785.
>>
>>
>>
>> No other blockers that I know of except what a final review pass might
>> turn up.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Chris Harrelson <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, June 25, 2026 1:16 PM
>> *To:* Daniel Clark <[email protected]>
>> *Cc:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Reference Target
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for working on this API, it solves an important a11y and
>> functional need.
>>
>>
>>
>> Given Mozilla is positive on this API, is there anything blocking landing
>> the spec PRs?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2026 at 4:22 PM 'Daniel Clark' via blink-dev <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> *Contact emails*
>>
>> [email protected], [email protected]
>>
>> *Explainer*
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/reference-target-explainer.md
>>
>>
>>
>> *Specification*
>>
>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/10995,
>> https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1353
>>
>> *Summary*
>>
>> Reference Target enables ID attributes like <label for>,
>> 'aria-labelledby', 'popovertarget', and 'commandfor' to be forwarded to
>> elements inside a component's shadow DOM, while maintaining the shadow's
>> encapsulation of its internal state. When a shadow host specifies an
>> element in its shadow tree to act as its reference target, all ID
>> references pointing to the shadow host are forwarded to the reference
>> target element instead.
>>
>>
>>
>> For example, here the <label>’s “my-checkbox” ID reference is forwarded
>> to the element in the shadow with the ID “real-checkbox":
>>
>>
>>
>> <label for="my-checkbox">Click me to toggle checkbox</label>
>>
>> <custom-checkbox id="my-checkbox">
>>
>> <template shadowrootmode="open" shadowrootreferencetarget="real-checkbox">
>>
>> <input id="real-checkbox" type="checkbox">
>>
>> </template>
>>
>> </custom-checkbox>
>>
>>
>>
>> Reference target can be set declaratively like in the above example, or
>> in JavaScript with ShadowRoot's 'referenceTarget' property.
>>
>> *Blink component*
>>
>> Blink>DOM>ShadowDOM
>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EDOM%3EShadowDOM%22>
>>
>> *Web Feature ID*
>>
>> referencetarget <https://webstatus.dev/features/referencetarget>
>>
>> *Motivation*
>>
>> Shadow DOM presents a problem for accessibility: there is not a way to
>> establish semantic relationships between elements in different shadow trees
>> (such as via 'aria-labelledby'). This limits the ability to design web
>> components in a way that works with accessibility tools such as screen
>> readers. The ARIAMixin IDL attributes (
>> https://w3c.github.io/aria/#ARIAMixin) are a partial solution to the
>> problem; however, they lack the ability to create a reference "into" a
>> shadow tree from the outside. Reference Target is a solution to that
>> missing piece of the problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> In addition to the issues with accessibility, ID attributes like
>> 'popovertarget' and 'commandfor' can’t be used to refer to elements inside
>> a shadow root without reference target.
>>
>> *Initial public proposal*
>>
>> https://github.com/WICG/aom/pull/207
>>
>> *TAG review*
>>
>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/961
>>
>> *TAG review status*
>>
>> Issues addressed
>>
>> *Origin Trial Name*
>>
>> Reference Target for Cross-Root ARIA
>>
>> *Chromium Trial Name*
>>
>> ShadowRootReferenceTarget
>>
>> *WebFeature UseCounter name*
>>
>> WebDXFeature::kDRAFT_ReferenceTarget
>>
>> *Risks*
>>
>>
>>
>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>
>> The interoperability risk is low since engineers from the other browser
>> engines have been active in spec discussions about the feature.
>>
>>
>>
>> This feature makes a change to the Toggle, Command, Interest, and Submit
>> events that presents a small compatibility risk. These events each have a
>> 'source'/'submitter' property that's set to the element triggering the
>> event, e.g. the button element clicked to open a popup. With reference
>> target this element can now be in a parent shadow tree relative to the
>> event is fired. Per discussion in
>> https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1098 there was a desire to
>> have the event's dispatch path include the source/submitter's tree. This is
>> done by setting these events' internal relatedTarget (
>> https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#event-relatedtarget) to
>> their 'source'/'submitter'
>>
>> and making the event composed when that relatedTarget is non-null. When
>> used with reference target this causes the event path to include a
>> 'source'/'submitter' in a parent shadow.
>>
>>
>>
>> When used without reference target, there is no change to these events'
>> event paths (since the source/submitter can never be in a parent shadow,
>> therefore the relatedTarget will be in the same tree as the target,
>> therefore the event won’t dispatch in the parent shadow per the current
>> event dispatch algorithm). But, the 'composed' property on the event will
>> be set to true. This has already been changed in the past for Command and
>> Interest events (
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6505682,
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/7797864), and
>> there's also history of changing these for Mouse events (
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4563502), so
>> I'm optimistic that this won't cause breakage. Most usage on Github (
>> https://github.com/search?q=%2Fevent%5C.composed%5B%5EP%5D%2F&type=code)
>> is either conditional on 'bubbles' also being true, which is false for the
>> events in question, or is or is specific to mouse events which aren't
>> affected here.
>>
>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1035)
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/356)
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive
>>
>>    - Why we still need reference target
>>    <https://gist.github.com/davatron5000/b6a62cb782f01c69e818cd4585391138>
>>    -
>>    https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/1120#issuecomment-4156132737
>>    - Lots of positive reactions on last year's Interop Project proposal
>>    for Reference Target, despite the feature not yet being eligible for the
>>    Interop Project at that time:
>>    https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/1011
>>
>>
>>
>> We ran an Origin Trial for the feature back in 133-135 but didn’t get
>> much developer uptake at the time. I attribute this to the difficulty of
>> poylfilling — see Activation section. We’ve since worked closely with
>> developers to ensure that the API meets their needs and they’ll be able to
>> adopt it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Activation*
>>
>> This is a difficult feature to polyfill since ID reference attributes
>> cannot pierce into shadow roots without it. So there's no way for a
>> polyfill to enable the capability that reference target enables. My hope is
>> that this will be mitigated by other browsers shipping the feature. Gecko
>> is positive, I've been discussing the spec changes with engineers from both
>> Gecko and WebKit, and Gecko and WebKit both have prototype implementations.
>>
>>
>>
>> There is already brief MDN documentation:
>>
>>
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Reference/Elements/template#shadowrootreferencetarget
>>
>>
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ShadowRoot#shadowroot.referencetarget
>>
>>
>>
>> There has sometimes been confusion about what scenarios the feature
>> unlocks, e.g. some developers assumed it directed ID references *out* of a
>> shadow root rather than *into* a shadow root. I'll ensure that we have good
>> documentation available including examples like those in
>> https://microsoftedge.github.io/Demos/reference-target/. The MDN docs
>> issue for the feature is still open at
>> https://github.com/mdn/content/issues/43453.
>>
>> *WebView application risks*
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>>
>> *Debuggability*
>>
>> No specific DevTools support is expected to be necessary. Existing
>> DevTools support for features used with reference target will continue to
>> work. For example, the accessibility tree viewer can be used to check that
>> an 'aria-labelledby' attribute is applied correctly even when it's used
>> cross-shadow-DOM with reference target.
>>
>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> *Is this feature fully tested by **web-platform-tests*
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> *?*
>>
>> Yes: https://wpt.fyi/results/shadow-dom/reference-target
>>
>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>
>> *No information provided*
>>
>> *Finch feature name*
>>
>> ShadowRootReferenceTarget
>>
>> *Rollout plan*
>>
>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>
>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>
>> False
>>
>> *Tracking bug*
>>
>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/346835896
>>
>> *Availability expectation*
>>
>> I've received positive engagement on the spec PR from WebKit and Gecko
>> engineers, and the feature is prototyped in both of those engines. So I'm
>> optimistic that they will follow in supporting this feature, though there
>> is no official commitment of support.
>>
>> *Adoption expectation*
>>
>> We are working with a developer partner who plans to adopt the feature
>> once it's shipped.
>>
>> *Non-OSS dependencies*
>>
>> None
>>
>> *Estimated milestones*
>>
>> Shipping on desktop
>>
>> 151
>>
>> Origin trial desktop first
>>
>> 133
>>
>> Origin trial desktop last
>>
>> 135
>>
>> Shipping on Android
>>
>> 151
>>
>> Shipping on WebView
>>
>> 151
>>
>>
>>
>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>
>> No breaking changes are expected.
>>
>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5188237101891584?gate=5152828586196992
>>
>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>
>> Intent to Prototype:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/CEdbbQXPIRk/m/U43spqbKAgAJ
>> Intent to Experiment:
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/C3pELgMqzCY/m/Lpb6DkueAQAJ
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/DS0PR00MB2527DA9DA93A1972F5594156C5EE2%40DS0PR00MB2527.namprd00.prod.outlook.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/DS0PR00MB2527DA9DA93A1972F5594156C5EE2%40DS0PR00MB2527.namprd00.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4083781f-5237-46a3-993e-349ab4071a55n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4083781f-5237-46a3-993e-349ab4071a55n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw-bNLuGQRCybr7jr2croYJkd5B-hwmeCSjBgAeVJSbtuQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to