LGTM3

On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 11:25 AM Philip Jägenstedt <[email protected]>
wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 5:25 PM Mike Taylor <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1
>> On 4/23/26 7:54 p.m., Jason Leo wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I have filed both.
>>
>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1393
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/650
>>
>>
>> Mike Taylor <[email protected]>于2026年4月24日 周五07:47写道:
>>
>>> On 4/22/26 10:36 a.m., Jason Leo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>>
>>> > were hoping you might be able to file explicit standards position
>>> requests with Mozilla and WebKit
>>>
>>> I think I may only need to send position requests to WebKit, as Mozilla
>>> already add path <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1983188> and
>>> shape <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1983190> into
>>> interop-2026-shape
>>> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017356>
>>>
>>> We don't consider a feature being in-scope to be an exception
>>> <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/wide-review/#exceptions>
>>> to filing a standards position - would you mind filing one for Mozilla
>>> <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions> as well?
>>>
>>> (back in 2023, I had specifically asked Mozilla about this, and they
>>> requested that we continue to file official standards position issues
>>> regardless - and to highlight that the feature is an Interop focus area)
>>>
>>>
>>> > https://webkit.org/blog/16794/the-css-shape-function/
>>>
>>> This post is only for clip-path, in fact, we already support both in
>>> clip-path, too.
>>>
>>> > Is it shipped in WebKit?
>>>
>>> No, and even worse, the safari will crash if it sees `shape(...)` inside
>>> `shape-outside` until the recently fixed PR
>>> <https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/59434/changes>, and you can
>>> check here
>>> <https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/blob/a5f61994499a9a688bd4fe13c8abf6666cc98fac/Source/WebCore/style/values/shapes/StyleShapeOutside.cpp#L84>
>>>  to
>>> see that they are not supported.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jason
>>> On Wednesday, April 22, 2026 at 11:19:38 PM UTC+8 Alex Russell wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Jason,
>>>>
>>>> Cool too this being implemented. We discussed this briefly at this
>>>> morning's API OWNERS call and were hoping you might be able to file
>>>> explicit standards position requests with Mozilla and WebKit. It's also not
>>>> clear what the developer interest here is. Your note links to the Interop
>>>> feature set for 2026, but looking at the tests included in Interop, I don't
>>>> see WebKit failing anything here:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/?label=master&label=experimental&aligned&view=interop&q=label%3Ainterop-2026-shape
>>>>
>>>> And I do see a blog post from them mentioning the feature:
>>>>
>>>> https://webkit.org/blog/16794/the-css-shape-function/
>>>>
>>>> Is it shipped in WebKit?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 8:23:44 AM UTC-7 Jason Leo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> > Summary
>>>>> Adds support for the path() and shape() shape functions in the CSS
>>>>> shape-outside property. These functions allow developers to define float
>>>>> exclusion shapes using rectangle coordinates, aligning Chrome with Firefox
>>>>> and Safari which already support this feature.
>>>>>
>>>>> The summary mistakenly says Firefox and Safari already support this
>>>>> feature; they don't. It's not updated in the Chrome status entry.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *> Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017356)
>>>>> This should be Positive(they put it into interop-2026-shape
>>>>> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017356>); Updated in
>>>>> the Chrome status entry
>>>>> On Tuesday, April 21, 2026 at 12:32:02 AM UTC+8 Chromestatus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> *Contact emails*
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Specification*
>>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-shapes/#shape-outside-property
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Summary*
>>>>>> Adds support for the path() and shape() shape functions in the CSS
>>>>>> shape-outside property. These functions allow developers to define float
>>>>>> exclusion shapes using rectangle coordinates, aligning Chrome with 
>>>>>> Firefox
>>>>>> and Safari which already support this feature.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Blink component*
>>>>>> Blink>CSS
>>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3ECSS%22>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web Feature ID*
>>>>>> shape-outside <https://webstatus.dev/features/shape-outside>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Motivation*
>>>>>> The CSS shape-outside property currently accepts basic shape
>>>>>> functions (circle(), ellipse(), inset(), polygon()) and the url() 
>>>>>> function
>>>>>> for image-based shapes, but it does not support path() or the newer 
>>>>>> shape()
>>>>>> function. This is an inconsistency in the CSS Shapes specification, since
>>>>>> path() and shape() are already supported in other CSS properties such as
>>>>>> clip-path and offset-path. Web developers who want to wrap text around
>>>>>> complex, arbitrary shapes are forced to work around this limitation by
>>>>>> using image-based workarounds (e.g., transparent PNG images with url()),
>>>>>> which are less ergonomic, harder to maintain, not responsive, and not
>>>>>> animatable. There is no way today to use an SVG-style path string or a
>>>>>> shape() command directly in shape-outside. Supporting path() and shape() 
>>>>>> in
>>>>>> shape-outside brings parity with clip-path and offset-path, reduces the
>>>>>> need for image-based hacks, and enables developers to define complex
>>>>>> text-wrapping shapes inline in CSS. It also enables shape animation when
>>>>>> combined with CSS transitions and animations, improving the 
>>>>>> expressiveness
>>>>>> and capability of CSS layout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Initial public proposal*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *TAG review*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *TAG review status*
>>>>>> Not applicable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Goals for experimentation*
>>>>>> None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Risks*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Interoperability and Compatibility*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017356)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebView application risks*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Debuggability*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?*
>>>>>> No
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?*
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Flag name on about://flags*
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Finch feature name*
>>>>>> CSSShapeOutsidePathAndShapeSupport
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Rollout plan*
>>>>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Requires code in //chrome?*
>>>>>> False
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Tracking bug*
>>>>>> https://issues.chromium.org/u/2/issues/502328208
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Estimated milestones*
>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 149
>>>>>> Shipping on Android 149
>>>>>> Shipping on WebView 149
>>>>>> Shipping on iOS 149
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Anticipated spec changes*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> *No information provided*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5080980370096128?gate=6491820889604096
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Links to previous Intent discussions*
>>>>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/69de62f9.050a0220.b4a7a.0053.GAE%40google.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fe168709-7de8-4e69-a715-c1a533999e5dn%40chromium.org
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fe168709-7de8-4e69-a715-c1a533999e5dn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/198b8fba-86b1-43ad-98ff-5336954d7036%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/198b8fba-86b1-43ad-98ff-5336954d7036%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYckcy9tybr1zZv73wR3W3qMDNdkvoyY4SE3qYgLpEqKRA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAARdPYckcy9tybr1zZv73wR3W3qMDNdkvoyY4SE3qYgLpEqKRA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_%2BqBxMCvKjYTA%2BTLmxFC%3DxGEbSUgaE1Dy1R229OTeAsg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to