On Fri, Sep 19, 2025, 1:46 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 2:26 PM Helmut Januschka <hjanusc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> @nrosent...@chromium.org - got you. should i do a follow up CL or revert >> and reland? >> > > I believe a follow up is sufficient > > Agreed! One think to look out for before we ship this is whether it regresses FCP/LCP for some sites. eg if the page relies on module scripts to load the LCP, having additional render frames in between scripts might slow it down. Hopefully it's a net positive and worth a try! <nrosent...@chromium.org> schrieb am Fr. 19. Sep. 2025 um 14:13: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 12:16 PM Helmut Januschka <hjanusc...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hey folks, >>> > >>> > We’ve recently landed a fix on issue where multiple deferred scripts >>> where all executing in the same task. That’s something developers have been >>> complaining about, as a source of long tasks in sites that have many >>> different deferred scripts from various sources. >>> >>> Thanks for working on this! This is great! >>> > >>> > The fix is behind the experimental SeparateDeferModuleScriptTasks flag >>> at the moment and +Scott Haseley is planning to Finch it to see its impact >>> on INP in the wild. >>> >>> I think this should be behind "test", as per this guideline: >>> >>> >>> https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/third_party/blink/renderer/platform/RuntimeEnabledFeatures.md#:~:text=If%20your%20feature%20could%20be%20reasonably%20expected%20to%20cause%20compat%20issues%2C%20please%20keep%20it%20marked%20no%20status%20or%20status%3A%22test%22%20%5B4%5D%2C >>> >>> If your feature could be reasonably expected to cause compat issues, >>> please keep it marked no status or status:"test" >>> >>> I think this can be reasonably expected to cause compat issues, though >>> I hope it doesn't! >>> >>> > There’s still an open question of whether the HTML spec needs to be >>> changed, or if “spin the event loop” allows for the tasks to be queued. >>> We’d appreciate opinions on that front. >>> >>> There is a discussion on this here: >>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6230 >>> The conclusion so far is that both the old behavior and the new >>> behavior are spec-compliant. >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "blink-dev" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. >> To view this discussion visit >> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFmjHKS2d6NpkoQnFDh1zhYD%2BnVYPGVjOr0R%2BTX_we_J6R%3D62g%40mail.gmail.com >> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFmjHKS2d6NpkoQnFDh1zhYD%2BnVYPGVjOr0R%2BTX_we_J6R%3D62g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJn%3DMYZPXX-RwMSoHEnPN7qK52XYWuj6R4GWjK_fC6gpa%2BGT8g%40mail.gmail.com.
