Friendly ping on this thread, any other input regarding shipping the
Translator API? Thanks!

On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 9:54 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <yoavwe...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> LGTM2
>
> There's some risk here with developers persisting the output of the API,
> which quality may vary depending on the current browser implementation.
> At the same time, it does seem like a useful feature for in-line instant
> translations to languages the content author hasn't predicted.
> It'd be good to have the feature's documentation warn developers against
> the risks, but I wouldn't consider them compat/interop risks.
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 3:49 PM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> LGTM1 - the team has demonstrated a clear demand for this type of
>> feature. I look forward to Mozilla shipping an alternate proposal - it
>> seems to me that it's complementary and not in conflict with us shipping
>> Translator now.
>> On 6/3/25 10:27 AM, Mike Taylor wrote:
>>
>> On 6/3/25 9:27 AM, 'Kagami Rosylight' via blink-dev wrote:
>>
>> > They haven’t given any negative signals on our proposed Translator API
>> (nor official positive ones).
>>
>> You can consider Mozilla to be negative here. We plan to make it more
>> clear in our counterproposal why we think it's better.
>>
>> If you're speaking on behalf of Mozilla, can you please also comment that
>> on https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1015?
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, June 3, 2025 at 12:07:35 AM UTC+2 dbo...@chromium.org wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emails
>>>
>>> dom...@chromium.org, kenji...@chromium.org, ay...@chromium.org,
>>> mem...@chromium.org, chris...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Explainer
>>>
>>> https://github.com/webmachinelearning/translation-api/blob/main/README.md
>>>
>>> Specification
>>>
>>> https://webmachinelearning.github.io/translation-api/#translator-api
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> A JavaScript API to provide language translation capabilities to web
>>> pages. Browsers are increasingly offering language translation to their
>>> users. Such translation capabilities can also be useful to web developers.
>>> This is especially the case when browser's built-in translation abilities
>>> cannot help. An enterprise policy (GenAILocalFoundationalModelSettings) is
>>> available to disable the underlying model downloading which would render
>>> this API unavailable.
>>>
>>> Blink component
>>>
>>> Blink>AI>Translate
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EAI%3ETranslate%22>
>>>
>>> TAG review
>>>
>>> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/948
>>>
>>> TAG review status
>>>
>>> Issues addressed
>>> TAG’s main feedback was on API naming, which has been addressed.
>>>
>>> Origin Trial Name
>>>
>>> Translator API
>>>
>>> Chromium Trial Name
>>>
>>> TranslationAPI
>>>
>>> Origin Trial documentation link
>>>
>>> https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/translator-api
>>>
>>> WebFeature UseCounter name
>>>
>>> kTranslator_Translate
>>>
>>> Risks
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> This feature has definite interoperability risks, including which
>>> languages are available across different browsers, how they are exposed,
>>> the quality of translations, and whether developers need the translations
>>> to be on-device or not. We can ameliorate some of these through API design,
>>> by making it clear that various methods might fail and that a fallback is
>>> required. Others, like translation quality, may end up as
>>> quality-of-implementation issues, similar to other machine learning-based
>>> APIs like shape detection.
>>>
>>> Gecko: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1015)
>>>
>>> Mozilla has published an alternate Translation API explainer
>>> <https://github.com/mozilla/explainers/blob/main/translation.md>. We
>>> have had ongoing discussions with Mozilla, both on-off and in the WebML
>>> Community Group about this subject. However the status of their proposal is
>>> unclear, as it hasn’t been presented to any community group or working
>>> group. When previously asking their WebML CG representative about it, they
>>> said they were monitoring the space and weren’t yet ready to present an
>>> alternative. They haven’t given any negative signals on our proposed
>>> Translator API (nor official positive ones).
>>>
>>> It is also worth noting that the mozilla/explainers proposal is strictly
>>> less powerful than the WebML CG one we are developing. That is, theirs can
>>> be polyfilled on top of ours, but not vice-versa. So if the proposal got
>>> traction in the future, we could add it as well, either natively or via a
>>> JavaScript polyfill.
>>>
>>> Additionally, some of the use cases that our partners have used the
>>> translator API for during the Origin Trial are not possible with the
>>> mozilla/explainers proposal. Some examples:
>>>
>>>
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Translating audio, in conjunction with web speech API for speech
>>>    recognition and generation
>>>    -
>>>
>>>    Translating user search terms, including translating them away from
>>>    the user’s preferred language (E.g. prompting a Spanish speaking user on 
>>> an
>>>    English e-commerce site with: “You entered ‘zapatos’. Did you mean to
>>>    search for ‘shoes’?”)
>>>
>>>
>>> WebKit: No signal (
>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/339)
>>>
>>> Web developers: Positive (https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/147
>>> )Perhaps
>>>
>>> Origin Trial signups have been 5x higher than what we see from typical
>>> Origin Trials, suggesting a lot of developer and partner interest. The
>>> survey conducted during the Origin Trial in February 2025 shows positive
>>> quantitative feedback [1], and third-party partners have utilized the API
>>> for various use cases [2].
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1DhFC2oB4PRrchavxUY3h9U4w4hrX5DAc5LoMqhn5hnk/mobilepresent?slide=id.g349a9ada368_1_6327
>>> [2] https://developer.chrome.com/blog/pb-jiohotstar-translation-ai
>>>
>>> Other signals:
>>>
>>> Activation
>>>
>>> This feature would definitely benefit from having polyfills, backed by
>>> any of: cloud services, lazily-loaded on-device models using WebGPU, or the
>>> web developer's own server. We anticipate seeing an ecosystem of such
>>> polyfills grow as more developers experiment with this API.
>>>
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> We have internal debugging pages which give web developers detail on
>>> installed language packs, e.g. chrome://on-device-translation-internals/,
>>> which may eventually be suitable to port to DevTools.
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>
>>> No, the initial launch focuses on desktop. In particular Windows, Mac
>>> and Linux. However we plan to expand support to the rest of the platforms
>>> in the future.
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?
>>>
>>> We have added some web platform test coverage for this feature (
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/ai/translator?label=experimental&label=master&aligned).
>>> How much we are able to test beyond the surface API is unclear, since no
>>> specific languages are guaranteed to be supported.
>>>
>>> Flag name on about://flags
>>>
>>> translation-api
>>>
>>> Finch feature name
>>>
>>> TranslationAPI
>>>
>>> Rollout plan
>>>
>>> Will ship enabled for all users
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>
>>> True
>>>
>>> Tracking bug
>>>
>>> https://issues.chromium.org/issues/322229993
>>>
>>> Launch bug
>>>
>>> https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4317965
>>>
>>> Measurement
>>>
>>> kTranslator_Create
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>>
>>> Shipping on desktop
>>>
>>> 138
>>>
>>> Origin trial desktop first
>>>
>>> 131
>>>
>>> Origin trial desktop last
>>>
>>> 136
>>>
>>> Origin trial extension 1 end milestone
>>>
>>> 138
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5172811302961152?gate=5141071125544960
>>>
>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>
>>> Intent to Prototype:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/2a9d154a-dc97-495b-afda-ba643712116bn%40chromium.org
>>>
>>> Intent to Experiment:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra9ArjjD0u%3DpFs1W_5%3DcMk49JXs5ObQ15dNHCHt3TKSW3g%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> Intent to Extend Experiment 1:
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAO4d-SsJ_U1RBpV-sMQEACqVkWnA_R3Y%3Dk19noGCE70sPV2yAA%40mail.gmail.com
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/37426513-b602-4fb0-b2be-48d3a667f108n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/37426513-b602-4fb0-b2be-48d3a667f108n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/dcea9895-d157-4716-9e95-f0a69edf96e3%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/dcea9895-d157-4716-9e95-f0a69edf96e3%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "chrome-chia" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to chrome-chia+unsubscr...@google.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msgid/chrome-chia/CAOmohSKOUDQ1tzfTjFstSDN8EagftXZYbEvdMa2b5f7HxpA4qw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/google.com/d/msgid/chrome-chia/CAOmohSKOUDQ1tzfTjFstSDN8EagftXZYbEvdMa2b5f7HxpA4qw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2B7ehXSUnQ4NahnUjZVWYnhpbPzS7pTQ2AWqCFzNckFiVUV9eA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to