LGTM3

On Thursday, May 15, 2025 at 1:59:36 PM UTC-7 Mike Taylor wrote:

> LGTM2
> On 5/14/25 8:55 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>
> LGTM1
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 4:08 AM Dominic Farolino <d...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for pointing this oversight out! It's been addressed in the spec, 
>> and the impl 
>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6547895> is 
>> up for review and looking good. So I'm hopeful that reviews here can 
>> proceed now.
>>
>> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 12:53 AM Domenic Denicola <dome...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I filed a question on the specification repository which I'd like to see 
>>> discussed before we ship this: 
>>> https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/issues/26
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 14, 2025 at 6:21 AM Chromestatus <
>>> ad...@cr-status.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Contact emails d...@chromium.org 
>>>>
>>>> Explainer https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/issues/20 
>>>> https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/issues/14 
>>>> https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/pull/23 
>>>>
>>>> Specification https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/pull/23 
>>>>
>>>> Design docs 
>>>> https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/pull/23 
>>>>
>>>> Summary 
>>>>
>>>> This feature adds `is_top_level` and `visibility_state` string fields 
>>>> to the crash reporting API body that gets sent to the default reporting 
>>>> endpoint for crash reports. See 
>>>> https://wicg.github.io/crash-reporting/#crash-report. For 
>>>> `is_top_level`: see https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/issues/20 
>>>> & https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/pull/23. The string value 
>>>> "true" or "false" is included depending on whether the Document sending 
>>>> the 
>>>> crash report belongs to a top-level traversable navigables. For 
>>>> `visibility_state`: see 
>>>> https://github.com/WICG/crash-reporting/issues/14#issuecomment-2452393164
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blink component Blink 
>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%22> 
>>>>
>>>> TAG review This seems like a very trivial addition to an existing API 
>>>> that does not justify a full TAG specification review. 
>>>>
>>>> TAG review status Not applicable 
>>>>
>>>> Risks 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>
>>>> There are no discernible compatibility risks. Interop-wise, we've 
>>>> received good remarks (but not yet formal support) from Mozilla about this 
>>>> change during a Web Perf WG meeting; we have not yet heard from Safari. I 
>>>> believe the interop risks for this proposal are very minimal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1225) I marked 
>>>> this as positive because the entire crash reporting API was marked as 
>>>> supportive by Mozilla in 
>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/288, and Martin 
>>>> pointed to that when I filed a more specific one for these two small 
>>>> additions. 
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/456#issuecomment-2859201260)
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: Positive Internal partners are very happy to receive 
>>>> this kind of new information in the crash report JSON body. 
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*: 
>>>>
>>>> Security 
>>>>
>>>> This proposal is sending information with a crash report, that 
>>>> developers already have access to, and could be sending to their own 
>>>> servers manually to keep track of application responsiveness or to 
>>>> estimate 
>>>> a crash. With this, we believe there are no security concerns with 
>>>> including this information in crash report bodies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes 
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ? No 
>>>>
>>>> There are no web platform tests for this tiny addition to the crash 
>>>> reporting API, because the crash reporting API itself cannot be tested 
>>>> this 
>>>> way at the moment. WPTs do not support crashing the renderer process for a 
>>>> contrived set of reasons (OOM, unresponsiveness, etc). Note that this has 
>>>> been documented in all of the other parts of this API that have shipped. 
>>>> See https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/tgRcEnqIb1A, 
>>>> for example.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Flag name on about://flags None 
>>>>
>>>> Finch feature name CrashReportingAPIMoreContextData 
>>>>
>>>> Rollout plan Will ship enabled for all users 
>>>>
>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False 
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>> Shipping on desktop 138 
>>>> Shipping on Android 138 
>>>> Shipping on WebView 138 
>>>>
>>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>>
>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>> of 
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>> None 
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5182880216776704?gate=5113784913625088 
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6823b7ea.050a0220.624fd.0209.GAE%40google.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/6823b7ea.050a0220.624fd.0209.GAE%40google.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>
> To view this discussion visit 
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra-tKwydKGbaEv%3D5Xevc0G9%3DmJXu35PMe0q7%3Db49zo%3DkFw%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra-tKwydKGbaEv%3D5Xevc0G9%3DmJXu35PMe0q7%3Db49zo%3DkFw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/a92fbbb4-d42e-433c-9bb2-34d977be2ebdn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to