The experiment was also enabled on 50% of Beta. Wouldn't that catch 
potential Enterprise breakages?

On Tuesday, May 13, 2025 at 8:25:44 PM UTC+2 Alex Russell wrote:

> LGTM3 with the caveat that we likely have risks to enterprise apps that 
> wouldn't have been visible from the 10% Finch experiement, and so we should 
> do this on-by-default in Beta for most of a cycle, and make sure that we 
> have a kill-switch in place in case of potential enterprise breakage in 
> Stable.
>
> Best,
>
>  Alex
>
> On Tuesday, May 13, 2025 at 10:49:45 AM UTC-7 Michał Bentkowski wrote:
>
>> Thanks! I updated the "Interoperability and Compatibility Risks" already 
>> on ChromeStatus.  
>> *--*
>> *Cheers,*
>> *Michał*
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 7:47 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
> LGTM2
>>>
>>> You left the Compatibility field empty which I don't think is accurate. 
>>> There is always a risk that sites depend on the exact output of a function 
>>> so please keep an eye open for any reported issues.
>>>
>>> /Daniel
>>> On 2025-05-13 07:55, 'Michał Bentkowski' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>
>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> I added the relevant information on ChromeStatus.
>>> *--* 
>>> *Cheers,*
>>> *Michał*
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 7:39 AM Domenic Denicola <dom...@chromium.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> LGTM1, but please update the following bits on ChromeStatus: 
>>>>
>>>>    - Estimated milestones. This is important for ensuring developers 
>>>>    have an accurate picture of when changes like this are rolling out. 
>>>>    Especially if this will be a gradual rollout of some sort, or has 
>>>>    previously been tested in a gradual manner, that information needs to 
>>>> be 
>>>>    captured. 
>>>>    - Interop and Compat impact: this definitely has compat impact. 
>>>>    Please summarize how this can change the behavior of web pages, and why 
>>>> we 
>>>>    believe it's safe. (You've done that elsewhere, but recording it in 
>>>>    ChromeStatus is helpful as that's a source of data we consult looking 
>>>>    backward.) 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 5:17 AM 'Michał Bentkowski' via blink-dev <
>>>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Out of curiosity, which platforms will this not be supported on, and 
>>>>> why?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, I put the wrong value there -- it will be supported on all 
>>>>> platforms.
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> Given that Firefox has implemented this (Nightly-only), as well as 
>>>>> Safari (not landed yet?), do we know why 
>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/6362 hasn't been merged yet?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anne left a comment: "We should probably hold off until Chromium has 
>>>>> actually deployed this?" so I think that's the reason.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Alison
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, May 9, 2025 at 2:18:27 AM UTC-7 Chromestatus wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails secur...@google.com 
>>>>>
>>>>> Explainer https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6235 
>>>>>
>>>>> Specification https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6235 
>>>>>
>>>>> Summary 
>>>>>
>>>>> Escape "<" and ">" in values of attributes on serialization. This 
>>>>> mitigates the risk of mutation XSS attacks, which occur when value of an 
>>>>> attribute is interpreted as a start tag token after being serialized and 
>>>>> re-parsed. 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blink component Blink>HTML>Parser 
>>>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EHTML%3EParser%22>
>>>>>  
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review Details are shared on 
>>>>> https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/6235. The change was tested 
>>>>> with Finch, ending on 10% of Stable. No web compat risks were observed. 
>>>>> The 
>>>>> only signal we got was that it broke a unit/e2e test which checked the 
>>>>> exact content of HTML generated by Chromium. 
>>>>>
>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable 
>>>>>
>>>>> Risks 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1209) 
>>>>>
>>>>> *WebKit*: Positive (https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/44842) 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Web developers*: No signals 
>>>>>
>>>>> *Other signals*: 
>>>>>
>>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>>
>>>>> None
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? No 
>>>>>
>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>> ? Yes 
>>>>>
>>>>> Flag name on about://flags enable-experimental-web-platform-features 
>>>>>
>>>>> Finch feature name EscapeLtGtInAttributes 
>>>>>
>>>>> Rollout plan Will ship enabled for all users 
>>>>>
>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False 
>>>>>
>>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>>
>>>>> No milestones specified
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>>>
>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>> issues 
>>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>> of 
>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>> None 
>>>>>
>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6264983847174144?gate=5114900925644800 
>>>>>
>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com>. 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1cd243fc-6071-46d5-8178-132fcd909b10n%40chromium.org
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1cd243fc-6071-46d5-8178-132fcd909b10n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>
>>>
>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHamrfXTQ4390_BWE0mcyCsaiOGXN_eEddCBbGfnN3RCcXnB9A%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHamrfXTQ4390_BWE0mcyCsaiOGXN_eEddCBbGfnN3RCcXnB9A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ead93991-d170-4016-85d9-f01846ede045n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to