LGTM2

On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 7:36 PM Vladimir Levin <vmp...@chromium.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 12:04:23 PM UTC-4 Dale Curtis wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2025 at 8:37 AM Vladimir Levin <vmp...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 2, 2025 at 12:05:53 AM UTC-4 Dale Curtis wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 7:16 PM Vladimir Levin <vmp...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> Some cameras and media will immediately begin exposing orientation
> information. In uncommon cases this orientation may change. If orientation
> changes during encoding through VideoEncoder frames with different
> orientation than the first are currently encoded with incorrect size and
> orientation. However the operation completes without a hard error. During
> discussions in the media working group it was decided that these cases
> should instead throw a non-fatal exception during encode(). There is
> already precedent for exception handling during encode() so authors should
> already be handling this case.
>
> Can you clarify if "uncommon" here means that some cameras are known to
> change the orientation and those cameras are typically rare, or that most
> cameras will change the orientation if say the user changes the
> orientation, but that user behavior is rare? :)
>
>
> I meant most cases will have a single fixed orientation for the duration
> of the session. Users changing their orientation is uncommon. It will
> almost always happen with users on mobile / hand-held devices accidentally
> or intentionally reorienting the device itself.
>
>
> I'm not sure how to reason about common-ness of the user device
> orientation changes, so I'm not convinced by this specific argument.
>
>
> Sorry, I forgot to cite my source: https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/
> timeline_v2?sid=9db1427b181520ab8c02f338ff6bb809 (internal only
> unfortunately), but ~99% of streams never see more than the initial
> transform.
>
>
> Cool thanks for the source!
>
>
>
>
>
> This does seem to introduce a new exception reason that seems almost
> expected to happen in some cases. Can you comment on whether the other
> exceptions that the author should already be happening are likewise
> "common"? There's a bit of a concern that authors that don't handle these
> exceptions will start breaking on orientation changing cases where
> previously they did not.
>
>
> Anecdotally, I'd say exceptions are uncommon for encode(). Exceptions will
> be thrown if a frame is already closed or the codec has been closed due to
> an error or reclaimed by system pressure (an automatic process which is not
> uncommon, but also generates an error signal).
>
> We discussed this concern in the working group. Keep in mind, encoding is
> already broken in these cases. It's just that instead of an exception the
> frame is either squished (perpendicular orientation) or encoded in mirror.
> As such the working group preferred a clear error signal to the silent
> issues that exist today.
>
> Additionally, given low WebCodecs VideoEncoder usage on mobile the actual
> risk of any issues seems unlikely:
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/3458
>
>
> That seems a more compelling argument: the current state would be broken
> in a different way, and the usage is very low. So this makes me think the
> change is pretty safe. Nevertheless, can you comment on the type of website
> that could potentially be impacted? Ie what are the common usages of this
> API?
>
>
> The most common of those affected would be some semi-RTC based site doing
> its own camera/capture work on Android. E.g., Zoom who we're working with
> on this.
>
>
> Ok, that's good to know, thanks.
>
> LGTM1
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Vlad
>
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Vlad
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4f46eb2b-e01d-4103-be00-50ecc05589a0n%40chromium.org
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/4f46eb2b-e01d-4103-be00-50ecc05589a0n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSKjmCxfwor-BvUjgj9SMm9%3DK_eLPF9gvL1sfroi9s4%3Dhg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to